Welcome To The Eye Of The Global Financial & Economic Storm

The First Storm Front

The first storm front hit early in 2007 when homebuyers in the US started missing their mortgage repayments. The first to suffer were those lenders that had specialised in the riskiest, “subprime” loans, such as the so-called NINJA loans – a slang term for a loan extended to a borrower with “No Income, No Job and No Assets”.

The global financial crisis, which quickly became an economic crisis, began with the failure of several US subprime mortgage lenders including, New Century Financial, DR Horton, Countrywide Financial and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The losses incurred by these mortgage lenders then began appearing on the balance sheets of banks such as HSBC, BNP Paribas, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, which had to write off huge losses. As a result the cost of borrowing rocketed and lending became scarce.

The US subprime fiasco became the trigger that burst the global credit bubble, ending 25 years of economic boom predicated on cheap debt and easy money.

The Eye Of The Storm

Right now we are in the eye of the global financial & economic storm. The relative calm that we are experiencing today, the so-called “economic recovery”, is merely temporary and has come at great cost.

In order to stave off the economic depression that would have resulted from the 07/08 global financial crisis, the world’s top eight central banks increased their balance sheets by $10 trillion, that’s around $2 trillion per year.

The fact is however, all of this money printing has only masked the problems and hasn’t fixed anything, in fact, underneath the surface the problems continue to worsen.

Even if unemployment in the US were to continue to fall, and the Eurozone and Britain were to avoid recession, we cannot avoid the second storm front, all we can do is postpone the day of reckoning.

The Second Storm Front

The natural corrective process cannot be forestalled forever. Sooner or later these huge unsustainable debts have to be repaid and the imbalances in the global financial system have to be corrected. We simply cannot begin a new cycle of sustainable prosperity until the malinvestment and bad debts have been cleansed, and assets prices are fairly valued.

Far from addressing the underlying structural issues facing the economy, the act of continuously adding to the burden of debt in order to keep the global economy bumbling along, actually increases the threat posed by the second storm.

Posted in Comment, Economic analysis, Global Financial Crisis, Monetary policy | Leave a comment

Notable Quotes – My thoughts on what the experts are saying

Daniel Hannan – 14 June 2011 “It ought to give us pause for thought when – in defiance of the teachings of every free-market economist, every ancient philosopher and all the main monotheistic religions – we run our economy on the basis of penalising thrift and rewarding fecklessness.”

Editor: I couldn’t agree more. The system is backward. Our politicians constantly remind us of the need for change but this is the sort of change we really need and there just isn’t the political will to carry it out.

Jim Rickards – 15 August 2011 “A normal recession is a credit driven event, it’s driven by credit and liquidity, the business cycle and the credit cycle and you get into it by tightening credit and you get out of it by loosening credit and it’s part of the normal expansion of the economy. But that’s not what we are dealing with right now, we are in a depression and a recession that takes place a depression is a very different animal because the problem is not liquidity, the problem is debt deflation and insolvency… we don’t have a liquidity crisis we have a solvency crisis. Easy money can be an answer to a liquidity crisis but easy money is not an answer to a solvency crisis.”

Editor: Jim goes on to say that the solution is to get rid of all the debt and that bond holders should take a fifty percent hair cut, which is something I completely agree with. We should not be socialising these losses by putting the burden on the tax payer. If you lend Greece money and they can’t pay it back (which they can’t), then you deserve to lose it. That’s how capitalism works.

Rob Arnott – 22 September 2011 “Absent deficit spending we’re already mired in the worst depression since The Great Depression. With deficit spending we’re propping up spending, we’re propping up consumption, we aren’t propping up prosperity. We’re borrowing from future prosperity to create an artificial prosperity today. That’s dangerous.”

Editor: Rob puts it very well. The sad thing is we are going to carry on propping up consumption.

Posted in Economic analysis, Market predictions, Monetary policy, Notable Quote, Sovereign Debt Crisis | Leave a comment

Gold Stocks Are Ready For Launch

As I reported yesterday, gold stocks, as measured by the HUI Index, have not kept up with the performance of the metal. However, in my opinion this is about to change. In fact, I expect gold stocks to play catch up in spectacular fashion over the next 12 to 18 months. Here’s why…

Why Own Gold Stocks? Why Not Just Own The Metal?

Since the start of the current gold bull market back in April 2001, gold has risen 573%, while the HUI gold stock index has returned 907%. Thus far then the large cap gold stocks have provided leverage to the gold price of a little under 2:1, however that was while the price of gold was moving up in an orderly, linear fashion.

Over the next few years, I expect the price of gold to begin moving up more rapidly and as a result I expect the stocks to provide significantly greater leverage to the price of the metal – likely upwards of 4:1.

Why Do Gold Stocks Provide Leverage To The Metal?

The reason that gold stocks provide leverage to higher gold prices is that as a stockholder, you not only get a share of the gold the company currently produces, you also get an interest in all the ounces in the ground that are yet to be mined and all the ounces that the company is yet to discover.

Why Do I Think The Gold Stocks Are About To Play Catch Up?

Yesterday I spoke about some of the factors that have been holding gold stocks back – chief among which was the fact that 2011 was a ‘risk off’ year. Today markets are being fuelled by massive liquidity that’s coming from central banks. This is sending all risk assets higher, and with today’s announcement of a second Greek bailout I see the ‘risk on’ trade continuing.

With governments around the world repeatedly demonstrating their willingness to do whatever it takes to keep the system from imploding, I am reminded of a passage from the book Dying of Money, by Jens O. Parsons:

“Everyone loves an early inflation. The effects at the beginning of inflation are all good. There is steepened money expansion, rising government spending, increased government budget deficits, booming stock markets, and spectacular general prosperity, all in the midst of temporarily stable prices. Everyone benefits, and no one pays. That is the early part of the cycle. In the later inflation, on the other hand, the effects are all bad. The government may steadily increase the money inflation in order to stave off the latter effects, but the latter effects patiently wait. In the terminal inflation, there is faltering prosperity, tightness of money, falling stock markets, rising taxes, still larger government deficits, and still roaring money expansion, now accompanied by soaring prices and ineffectiveness of all traditional remedies. Everyone pays and no one benefits. That is the full cycle of every inflation.”

In this environment of massive money printing higher gold prices are all but assured, and with higher gold prices comes even greater profitability for the companies that produce the metal.

Minting money…

The average cost of mining an ounce of gold is $515 an ounce and given that those ounces are selling for $1,738 the typical gold miner is making more than $1,200 on every ounce they sell. Therefore a company like Yamana which is producing 1 million ounces a year is generating $1.2 billion a year in cash flow.

Some of these companies are using the money to build new mines which will provide future cash flow while others are returning it to shareholders in the form of dividends.

Newmont Mining, the second-biggest bullion producer globally, announced 26 October that going forward its dividend payouts will be linked to the price of gold. This means that the higher the price Newmont achieves for the gold it sells, the more it gives back to shareholders in the form of a dividend. For every $100 rise in bullion, Newmont will increase its dividend by $0.30 a share and if/ when gold goes over $2,000 and ounce, Newmont will increase its dividend by $0.40 a share for every $100 increase in the price of gold. In an environment of negative real interest rates such dividend payments will likely prove very attractive.

The fact is, even if we don’t see a rise in the price of gold (which I think is incredibly unlikely) these companies look very attractive which is why they are starting to attract the ‘smart money’ – something that was revealed in the latest 13f filings.

A Possible Mania

According to Dow Theory, bull markets have three phases, the third of which is the steepest part of the assent. It’s during this third and final phase that the general public enter the market, and it’s the one in which fear buyers are joined by greed buyers in bidding up prices.

Extreme sentiment and mass participation often turn the final phase of a bull market into a mania – just as we saw in the dot-com bubble in the year 2000.

Between 10 March 1999 and 10 March 2000 the NASDAQ Composite rose 113% to close at 5,132.52. This final blow-off top was created as the public entered the market.

In a mania the gold stocks could reach levels that are simply hard to imagine, particularly as the sector is so small.

The 16 largest gold companies that make up the HUI have a combined market capitalisation of around $221 billion, while Apple Computers alone has a market cap of $468 billion. Therefore a mass influx of new money would send these stocks significantly higher.

Posted in Gold Stocks, Stocks, Ways to bet | Leave a comment

Writing The News Before It Happens: New Drachma Provides Boost To Greek Tourism

CCB News – 4 June 2013

The return of the Greek drachma is providing a significant boost to tourism in Greece. New government figures from the Greek National Tourism Organisation (GNTO) show that visitor numbers are up 6% compared to this time last year.

Package holiday specialist Thomson is also reporting record bookings to popular island destinations such as Corfu, Rhodes and Crete. 

Leaving the euro and readopting the drachma, allowed Greece to devalue its currency. The ‘New Drachma’, as it’s been dubbed, is worth almost 60% less than the euro it replaces which is providing the nation’s tourism industry with a much needed boost. 

The increase in visitor numbers is being watch closely by other ‘Club Med’ nations such as Spain and Portugal who are still in the single currency.

Posted in Comment, Humour | Leave a comment

Gold Stocks Are At Their Cheapest In Almost Three Years Relative To The Metal

Gold stocks, as measured by the HUI Index, are at their cheapest level in almost three years relative to the price of the actual metal. The question is: Why have gold stocks performed so badly versus the actual metal? And what does this mean for those investing in the sector?

The chart below shows the HUI:Gold ratio which indicates the performance of the gold shares relative to the price of gold itself.

A 3 Year Chart Of The HUI:Gold RatioChart courtesy of Stockcharts.com

At the climax of the equity market selloff in March of 2009 the HUI:Gold ratio briefly reached 0.2843, today the ratio is only marginally above that level at 0.302. What this means is that those companies included in the HUI index are as cheap relative to gold, as they were when the FTSE and the DOW were trading at around 3,530 and 6,626 respectively.

Over this three year period there were three distinct periods. Coming off the March 09 lows the stocks actually outperformed the metal. Then, from late 09 to early 2011 the ratio traded in a broad range. However since April 2011 the gold stocks have fallen dramatically versus the bullion.

So why haven’t the stocks kept pace with the bullion?

Perhaps the biggest single reason the gold mining stocks haven’t kept pace with the rise in the price of bullion, is that 2011 was a year characterised by a flight to safety rather than an appetite for risk. This meant that gold stocks were sold along with general equities as investors moved their money into cash, government bonds and gold. This move fuelled a huge rise in the price of bullion, with the yellow metal rising from $1,309.10 in January 2011 to an all-time high of $1,923.70 in early September, a rise of over 46%.

Another important reason for the outperformance of the bullion has to do with the ratio spread trade. This is a tactic that the hedge fund world began using around 2006, in which they go long the metal (or the ETF) and go short a selection of the gold shares. The funds target the weaker gold stocks that have been dragged higher along with the overall sector, and it’s a very profitable strategy.

A third factor that has long hampered the performance of the shares relative to the metal was the introduction of gold ETF GLD back in November 2004. GLD provides hedge funds and other large players with a way to gain leveraged exposure to the price of gold without the need to own the mining shares. All they have to do is own GLD on margin. This introduction of GLD siphoned money out of the mining shares and it is yet to return.

A Closer Look At The HUI Index

The HUI (also known as the NYSE Arca Gold BUGS Index) is the most widely followed index of companies involved in gold mining. The index is designed to provide significant exposure to near term movements in gold prices by including companies that do not hedge their gold production beyond 1.5 years.

Companies Included In The HUI IndexChart courtesy of amex.com – Index components as of 1 December 2011

There are some companies within the HUI index that have performed well over the past 12 months, however the majority have either gone nowhere or have fallen considerably.

Among the worst performers are Hecla Mining which is down 52% over the past 12 months, Kinross which is down 33%, Iamgold which is down 23%, and Eldorado Gold which is down 22%. Agnico-Eagle is also down 49% after taking a $644 million writedown on its Meadowbank project in northern Canada.

The best performers include Yamana Gold which is up 33% over the past 12 months, Randgold Resources which is up over 35%, and New Gold which is up 22%.

What does it all mean?

What all this means is that those looking to invest in gold mining equities really need to do their homework. Simply buying an index is unlikely to provide leverage to the metal. Personally I see more upside in the smaller producers rather that in many of the large cap names found in the HUI. It’s for this reason that I favour funds such as Black Rock Gold & General which has recently increased its focus on higher quality, mid-tier producers.

The Black Rock Gold & General fund

The Black Rock Gold & General fund, the biggest gold fund available to UK investors, can be held inside a Stocks and Shares (Maxi) ISA and is managed by Evy Hambro. The fund has recently reduced its exposure to those companies that may be required to raise capital in order to develop their projects and it has increased its holding of gold royalty companies, both of which are excellent strategic moves.

The fund’s performance speaks for itself: £1,000 invested in the fund in 1999 would now be worth £12,436 (as at 31 May 2011 if invested in an ISA.

Posted in Charts, Comment, Gold, Gold Stocks, Ways to bet | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Get Ready For A Sugar High

Sugar prices nearly tripled between May 2011 ($0.13 a pound) and 2 February 2012 ($0.36 per pound). Since then sugar has entered a potentially bullish consolidation pattern, and the fundamental supply and demand picture also looks positive. The combination of these two forces has the potential to bring about a price of sugar considerably higher, a situation that could provide to be both an excellent short-term trade as well as a decent longer-term investment for a trader.

The Fundamentals

Demand for sugar has risen considerably in recent years, thanks to increased consumption among Asian consumers, especially those in China, and increased demand for sugar-based ethanol as an alternative to gasoline.

This long-term trend towards increased demand is currently being exacerbated by shorter-term demand coming from countries such as Indonesia and Russia. Indonesia will import 240,000 tonnes of raw sugar this year to meet domestic demand. Russia may also have to import 550,000 tonnes of sugar this year due to its inability to meet local demand despite a record harvest.

One of the world’s biggest producers of sugar, Cosan, sees sugar prices rising in coming months. In a recent conference call the company’s Chief Financial Officer, Marcelo Martins, told reporters “An output recovery in Brazil and Russia doesn’t mean we will have enough sugar to surpass global demand by a large margin… we see a tight scenario and are bullish on sugar prices.”

A recent report by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) also predicts that world sugar prices are likely to stay high in 2012 due to factors such as fluctuations in the price of oil. The report states that “Oil price changes affect world sugar prices by influencing trade-offs in producing either sugar or ethanol in Brazil. Brazil is the largest sugar producer and exporter in the world as well as the second largest ethanol producer.” When the price of oil is high Brazil has more incentive to produce ethanol and less incentive to produce sugar, thus reducing the quantity of sugar the nation exports.

Long-term outlook

The long-term outlook for this soft commodity looks set to remain bullish. Czarnikow Group, a respected firm in agricultural commodity markets, estimates that over the next two decades the cost of producing sugar in Brazil is expected to rise by 85% and that without investment of between $340 billion and $490 billion, Brazil is unlikely to meet rising global demand. Both of these factors are likely to support higher sugar prices in the years to come.

The Technical’s

Between 11 May 2011 and 2 February 2012 the price of sugar rose sharply from $0.13 a pound, to an all-time high of over $0.36, a rise of 177%. Since then sugar has been consolidating and in doing so has formed a potentially bullish Symmetrical Triangle pattern.

This type of pattern is typically formed after a big move up or down, when neither the bulls nor the bears gain control. The result is a market that drifts sideways forming a series of lower highs and higher lows which form a contracting wedge pattern often referred to as a coiled spring.

It has been estimated that around 75% of symmetrical triangle patterns result in a continuation of the prior trend. However the direction is not known for certain until a decisive breakout is seen. This breakout should be accompanied by a spike in volume to confirm the move.

A 22 Month Chart of SugarChart courtesy of Stockcharts.com

How to play a possible breakout

Since the ultimate direction of the breakout won’t be known until it occurs, those looking to potentially trade such a move may wish to wait for a day or two after a breakout to determine whether or not the breakout is real. Expert traders often look for a one-day closing price above the downtrend line in a bullish pattern, and below the uptrend line in a bearish chart pattern, before entering the trade.

The price target for the breakout is calculated by measuring the distance between the widest two points of the pattern (green arrow), and adding (or subtracting) it from the breakout price. A breakout from the $0.28 level would give a price target of $0.43, although the precise target won’t be known until the breakout is seen and it would be prudent to consider introducing a stop loss before the price reaches its final target in order to limit risk.

Posted in Charts, Comment, Commodities, Spread Betting, Technical Analysis, Trading, Trading Opportunity, Ways to bet | Leave a comment

Redefining Risk: “Risk Free” Isn’t Risk Free

The deliberate policy of financial repression which has been adopted by the British government (and many others around the world) has redefined the conventional notion of risk.

Key to a successful policy of financial repression are negative real interest rates, that is, interest rates well below the rate of inflation, and this is what we have today. As a result, investments that were previously deemed “risk free”, are no longer without risk.

All too often I here savers tell me that their cash is “safe” and that “at least I won’t lose any money”. This is a very dangerous belief and one that is patently false. Yes their monthly statement will continue to say X £’s every month, but in an environment of financial repression the nominal value of assets quickly becomes much less relevant. What matters is their real value i.e. their value adjusted for inflation.

Even though inflation (I use the Retail Prices Index (RPI) because it’s a more complete measure of inflation) has fallen from 5.6% in September 2011, to 3.9% today, the majority of investors are still losing money. The table below shows just how much they are losing every year, based on how much they have saved and what percentage return they are getting.

The fact is, unless you are earning at least 3.9% on your cash in the bank, you are losing money.

Posted in Comment, Financial Repression, Inflation, Interest Rates, Monetary policy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

What We Really Need Is A Much Bigger Crisis

As ridiculous as it sounds what’s really needed in order to fix the global economy is a much bigger crisis. The problem today is that each mini crisis is small enough to be papered over with freshly printed money, thereby repeatedly postponing the day of reckoning.

Unfortunately our current financial system is beyond saving and in order to begin a new cycle of true prosperity we must first radically restructure our economy, and this is something that simply won’t happen while we cling to the belief the things will get better on there own. They won’t.

Only when we have a crisis that’s so big that it takes the whole system down can we begin the process of building a new system that is inherently sound. The alternative is perhaps a decade of slow, or even, no growth, high unemployment, high inflation, low wage growth and falling living standards. Personally I would rather get the pain over quickly.

Posted in Comment, Economic analysis, Global Financial Crisis, Monetary policy | Leave a comment

Trading Update: Potash, Corn & Sony

Potash

As the chart below shows, the Potash trade I first identified back on 12 January peaked out at $48, just shy of my $49-50 target. Fortunately those that took my advice and tightened up their stop losses back on 31 January would have still been stopped out at a nice profit.

A 3 Month Chart Of Potash CorporationChart courtesy of Stockcharts.com

Corn

The potential trade in corn that I outlined 25 January remains in play. Corn continues to form a Descending Triangle pattern which is a continuation pattern and is generally considered to be a bearish formation that indicates distribution.

The pattern is formed as the bears gradually gain control and repeatedly push down the price. This selling pressure is countered by the bulls who are able to put a floor under the price, establishing an area of support (blue horizontal line). As the pattern develops the pressure builds and either the bulls capitulate leading to a downside breakout which confirms the pattern as bearish, or the bulls win the day and the pattern becomes invalid.

When support is broken it typically becomes resistance and it’s not unusual for the price to return to this level before moving down in earnest.

The target price for a downside breakout is around 365, a figure which is calculated by measuring the distance between the widest two points of the pattern, and subtracting it from the horizontal support line.

A 15 Month Chart Of Corn

Chart courtesy of Stockcharts.com

The break below the horizontal support line should ideally be accompanied by a spike in volume, as this would help validate the move, however it is not absolutely necessary.

Sony  

The other potential trade I mentioned 25 January was in Sony Corp. and the stock has now broken out of its Falling Wedge pattern. A falling wedge pattern is a contracting trading range with a downward tilt, illustrated by the two blue lines. This type of pattern is typically a reversal pattern and this was certainly the case with Sony.

A 2 Year Chart Of Sony Corp.Chart courtesy of Stockcharts.com

The pattern was confirmed with a decisive breakout on high volume (circled) and the stock should now advance to my target area at around $26.

Note how having broken out of the pattern the price dipped back to test the downtrend line, something that is very common with this type of move.

Posted in Charts, Comment, Commodities, Stocks, Technical Analysis, Trading, Trading Opportunity, Ways to bet | Leave a comment

Global Banking Crisis: We’ve Got At Most 2-3 Years Before The Wheels Come Off In Spectacular Fashion

The European sovereign debt crisis is really a European banking crisis, and by extension a global banking crisis, and so serious is the threat of a global banking collapse that the ECB has resorted to borrowing money from the Fed in order to keep the system from imploding.

Here’s how it works…

ECB head Mario Draghi calls Ben Bernanke over at the US Federal Reserve and asks to exchange some Euros for US dollars – the so called dollar swap lines. The ECB then floods the banking system with these freshly printed dollars through its Long Term Refinancing Operation (LTRO), and the banks then use the money to buy high-yielding Spanish, Italian and Greek debt.

The banks like it because they get to pocket the difference between the 1% LTRO rate and the 6% paid on Italian bonds, which helps them recapitalise their balance sheets. And European leaders like it because it helps keep bond yields low and postpones a debt default from Greece, Portugal, or any of the other struggling Eurozone nations.

Without the Fed/ECB buying up these “toxic assets” the yields on these nations bonds would soar, leading to a debt spiral and either default or a breakup of the Eurozone. Either of which would likely tip a number of Europe’s banks over the edge – many of which are already considered insolvent. This, in turn, would send shockwaves throughout the global banking system. The Fed then, is no longer just the lender of last resort for the US, it’s now the lender of last resort to Europe as well.

So we have insolvent countries propping up insolvent banks, propping up insolvent countries… it’s akin to a Pyramid/ Ponzi scheme, the question is, how long can it go on? My guess is we’ve got at most 2-3 years before the wheels come off in spectacular fashion.

Posted in Bonds, Comment, Economic analysis, European Debt Crisis, Global Financial Crisis, Market predictions, Monetary policy, Sovereign Debt Crisis | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment